The US election is only eight days away. The race over the last week gets tighter. Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton remains ahead in most polls, Republican candidate Donald Trump has recently taken the lead in crucial swing states such as Florida and Ohio. So, how will markets respond?

Our general stance on the election is mostly agnostic.

We are not hugely fond of either candidate. Trump certainly would be a wild-card should he be elected. However, Clinton would likely remain more tied to the existing political establishment. She would likely continue the general trajectory of most of Obama’s initiatives of the last eight years.

From our viewpoint, it is not so much which candidate ends up winning the election. It is rather the recent polls showing Americans’ negative sentiment toward both candidates which is most noteworthy.

Indeed, polls this week show that for the first time, the majority of Americans view both candidates as “unfavorable”.

(Note: the most recent percentages are now higher than even the chart above shows. 52.4% unfavorable rating for Clinton. 59.1% for Trump.)

The level of distrust amongst Americans toward their politicians is at an all-time high.

As a result, it is fascinating to note that Americans’ trust in the mass media is also now at multi-decade lows. The most recent 2016 poll from Gallup shows that the percentage of Americans who have “trust and confidence” in mainstream news outlets has fallen to just 32%.

Something unprecedented is happening here both politically and culturally.

This is at least one reason to hold some physical precious metals outside the banking system. factor mentioned above is regardless of what happens to the prices in the near term.

How Will Markets Respond & Elections

Historically speaking, since 1900 the data we have available does show that democratic Presidents correspond to better performances in the broad stock market. Over their terms in office, it is statistically higher than the performance seen with Republican Presidents. Look to the chart below.

However, correlation certainly does not equal causation.

For example, the data does not take into account the myriad of other factors that could have impacted the market averages over these years. Look at central bank policies, debt accumulation due to war, or the bursting of market bubbles.

The data is additionally only expressed in nominal terms. When inflation-adjusted or priced in gold, the data would reveal entirely different results.

We also know that there are delays as new policies work their way into an economy. Could higher stock market performances in certain years came as a result of policies implemented in prior administrations?

We cannot know any of this for sure. What we can do is observe the correlation and attempt to decipher what it will mean going forward. Democrats do tend to see better stock market performances during their years in office.

The Election and Precious Metals

Let’s turn our attention to precious metals and the election outcome. Let us first consider the above-mentioned factor concerning higher stock prices under Democratic Presidents. Stocks and gold are often (but not always) counter-cyclical assets. We can surmise that gold and silver should be expected to perform better under a Republican President.

We can observe that the two most significant bull markets in precious metals over the last 50 years began under two Republican Presidents. The 1971 – 1980 advance of 2,400% in gold started under Republican President Nixon. The 2001 – 2011 progress of 760% in gold began under President Bush II.

We must recall that the seeds of these precious metals bull markets came in the years before the Republicans took office.

As unsustainable debt and currency depreciation during the prior years eventually forced a revaluation higher in the world’s last monetary reserve: gold.

Again, we are hesitant to give sole credit to Democrats for the outperformance of the stock market. We cannot give sole credit to Republicans for the outperformance of the gold market.

The Brexit Effect

In the coming election, a Trump victory would be a wild-card outcome. It is not something seen likely in current electoral polls.

Fundamentally, we believe most markets are siding with the polls and “pricing in” a Clinton victory.

However, markets — and polls — are not always correct.

As we saw in Britain with the June Brexit decision in which polls before the vote still hinted that the UK would not leave the EU.  Markets can indeed fool buyers.

Since Clinton’s victory prices in, a Trump surprise win would be a shock for most major stock and currency markets.

As such, we contend that a surprise Trump victory might cause a spike in gold. It would be similar to the $110 intraday surge seen on June 24 as votes came in Britain. This time, the gold spike, would come from the US dollar and/or US stock market.

 

How Will Americans Express Their Distrust?

No matter who ends up winning the American election on November 8, the most critical trend to follow is the general population that now distrusts both primary candidates and also the mainstream media.

There are not too many dominos that need to fall. The majority of Americans distrust their government leaders. At least a portion of those Americans decide to vote with their wallets and buy a modest allotment of gold or silver.

If you can’t trust the President, and you can’t trust the media, who can you trust?

Still today, only 1% of Americans own any precious metals whatsoever.

Can we begin to fathom what would happen to prices if that percentage were to double to say 2%? What if 10% of Americans wanted to have 10% of their net worth in gold and silver?

The fundamentals behind this sort of movement into the only asset outside of government control are as strong as they could be. The critical question remains in time. It is still early in this cycle. When will more people wake up?


Christopher Aaron,
Bullion Exchanges Market Analyst

Christopher Aaron has been trading in the commodity and financial markets since the early 2000s. He began his career as an intelligence analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency. The CIA is where he specialized in the creation and interpretation of pattern-of-life mapping in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Technical analysis shares many similarities with mapping. They both base on the observations of repeating and embedded patterns in human nature.

His strategy of blending behavioral and technical analysis has helped him and his clients. It has helped to identify both long-term market cycles and short-term opportunities for profit.

This article is a third-party analysis. It does not necessarily match the views of Bullion Exchanges. Readers should not consider it as financial advice in any way.

2 Comments

  1. Doug Hildenbrandt

    Fair and informative analysis.

  2. Dimitri T Kentros

    I’ve bought 1/4 ounce of gold per month since I was 41 years of age. It’s paid off my home fixed my teeth, paid for my wedding. And now that I’m on a fixed income retired. I afford a new vehicle and live a nice life style of comfort.
    Wake up people
    You can only print out so many dollars with out backing the dollar. By Presous medal

    Dimitri Theodore Kentros

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *